Friday, October 21, 2011

The Constitution

Why do we trust our government to protect and defend the constitution of the United States? Think about it. There are thousands of laws on the books that the people must follow but the constitution is really a set of laws for us. It is a set of laws that our government must follow. The constitution is the only power check we really have against an overbearing government yet we lazily expect them to protect it for us. Why would they want to protect the very laws that act as their shackles? They don't and that's why it is now and it always has been up to the people to protect the constitution. More than ever we need to take our role as the protectors of our rights seriously.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Something political? Saving the free market without releasing the beast.

I've noticed a lot of candidates using the phrase "getting government out of the way". Usually this is followed by something like "so they can make more profit and hire people. ..
I hate the phrase "getting government out of the way". The divide between many sensible people is created with this idea and way of thinking. It's not hard to imagine why someone that is primarily a democrat (I use democrat because this is the republican primary) might look at that statement and see it as cutting the few restraints left holding a very dangerous creature that has so far only showed itself to want to rape and pillage humanity and the environment to gain more power for itself (speaking of big corporations of course).

It’s not hard to understand someone fearing this happening and thinking that anyone that would want to do this is either not thinking clearly or worse, is on the side of this beast.

The difference between when I hear Ron Paul speak of this vs someone like Palin or Cain is that Ron Paul seems to understand that it’s about the market (which is controlled by the needs and wants of the people) and not the massive corporations that just want to be free to rape and pillage more.

What needs to be talked about more is the fact that government regulation doesn't hold down the big scary beast at all; but instead it sets the rules so the beast can grow bigger and competition outside of a few major players becomes impossible. Government regulation doesn't get in the way of hiring people as much as it gets in the way of the free market doing its work and creating the jobs needed to supply this massive economy.

I think if that was talked about more with less about getting the government “out of the way” or lowering the burden on the haves so they can better open their hearts and wallets to the have nots, we might get an intelligent discussion in this country instead of two sides that not only don't understand each other but usually don't even understand the argument they themselves are trying to make.

To think about it another way, don’t you think that if the big corporations really wanted government “out of the way” they would be pushing like hell for someone like Ron Paul? What do they instead do over and over again? They give boatloads of money and resources to big government politicians that set the rules in their favor while disguising it as regulation. It’s much more profitable to have the rules set in your favor than to have no rules at all.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Increase your reading speed and comprehension

This is a great tool to improve your reading speed and efficiency. This is something everyone should be interested in doing in my opinion.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Why the US dollar's decline doesn't help imports

The US Dollar.

Today the US dollar took another hit, breaking key support levels. For years now you've heard that lower currency value is good for exports. Ever wonder why this wasn't ever the case before? Here's the truth.

When the dollar goes down, it doesn't help the US export more because we don't export in dollars. For instance, when Coke sells product other countries, they do so through their foreign counterparts just like many other companies. So for instance, let's say the Euro and the dollar are on equal ground and you can trade them 1:1. Now lets say that a 2 liter bottle of Coke costs $2 in the US and 2 euros in Italy but let's also say that Coke sells these 2 liters to their vendors for $1 and 1 euro respectively. What happens if the Euro gains on the dollar? Does Coke get to sell more to Europe? No.

For our example lets say that the dollar loses value to the Euro and now it's $1.50 to each Euro. Coke doesn't drop their price to European vendors, they leave it the same. See, to the average person living in Europe, the dollar dropping in value doesn't give them more buying power unless they are planning a trip to a country that uses the dollar as their main form of currency. Their pay stays the same, their rent stays the same, and their price on a 2 liter bottle of Coke also stays the same. They still pay 2 Euros and the vendor still bought it from coke for 1 euro. The difference now is that coke gets to exchange that for $1.50 instead of $1. On the flip side, a lower dollar value also allows them to "keep up with inflation" and raise the prices in the US too.

You may have noticed that even though Coke is now getting more money, they haven't actually increased their worth since those dollars they now have are worth less. It's like splitting shares of a stock, sure you have more shares but your portfolio is still worth the same amount. So why then is this good for the multinational corporations?

Coke, like many other companies is only as good as it's stock price. Stock is a currency that can be used to purchase assets, get cheap loans, and pay employees. If the price of the stock is stagnant, it's not worth very much to an investor and it doesn't work well as collateral. On top of that, if a companies stock price is low, it makes them susceptible to hostile buyouts and even lawsuits buy investors that say they aren't maximizing their shareholders value (which by law a public company must do).

The ultra wealthy don't get rich by having a job and saving; they get rich by using (controlling) the markets. This is their preferred vehicle because it's potential is virtually limitless. They also aren't investing like you and I and hoping for 10% gains each year, they are swooping in and swiping trillions worth of value at one time before setting up the pieces again. Every time a market crashes and the whole country is complaining about losing their money  and CNBC is telling us that trillions of dollars evaporated, you have to realize that this money can't evaporate. You put it in, it came out somewhere and that somewhere is usually the the private banking cartels (that then claim to need tax payer bailouts in the trillions as well and get it while you lose your job and then they even get people to start screaming that we're a welfare society while the poor and middle class get services cut and the rich are handed trillions) I'm off course here.

The point is that for no extra work, the huge multinationals can appear to have massively increased their bottom line and they didn't have to hire more people or sell more product to do so. On a wide scale this increases the value of the stock markets which encourages everyone to put their money in it again. On top of this, money being worth less means that stocks have to sell for more so the market moves up even higher. The final piece is that the dollar is dropping in value so holding it is no longer a safe haven and that encourages even more investment in the market. Once again, we get a bubble and the market manipulators on top pull out the rug while the people lose all their value and pull out with less dollars that are worth even less and the rich get richer.

The argument of the cheap dollar being good for exports is a flawed argument. The reason China can have such cheap prices isn't currency manipulation but the lifestyle the Chinese lead and the efficiency of their operations. In America, if we don't have 3 flat screen TV's, 2 cars that are 4 years or newer, a kid with a smart phone, a guest room, 1500 channels,  2 different $400 video game systems, an iPad to match your MacBook for when your not around to use your desktop, designer clothes, and whatever else you might deem necessary, your life is hard. The live without all that stuff (not because they don't want that stuff) because they aren't paid enough to buy it so it doesn't permeate their society.

In other words, they can and do live on much less than we do so they can do everything cheaper than us. It's not their currency, it's their society. Lowering the currency value just makes it harder for the citizens of that country as pay never rises as fast as inflation, while making it easier for people in other countries to come over and buy our land, companies, and assets. It makes us less competitive in a global market, not more so. The only people it helps are those that control the markets and the huge multinational corporations that support them.

Please do your homework and please realize that this isn't a right vs left argument. I personally believe strongly that the government should be out of our lives and that includes much of the welfare their provide but I also believe that this can't be done until we expose the larger leak in our society at work and that is the Federal reserve, their member banks, and the huge multinationals with all the lobbying power. Our social programs aren't designed to help the people, they are designed to help the elite and while one day we will have to drop them, turning on each other on these topics right now is completely counter productive.

Monday, March 14, 2011

The social platform for social change

Today I launched a social change experiment. I've created a Facebook fan page urging the popular group purchasing site, Groupon to make a change that I believe would positively affect the current state of America.

While starting a Facebook page to promote a cause is not exactly a new idea, the idea here is to see how much leverage it takes to provide real change. The experiment is not the Facebook page but the entire platform known as Groupon.

Let me explain the idea and then I'll get into what I'm talking about. The idea is what I'm calling Groupon: Made in America. Basically, it's requesting that Groupon do one weekly, nationwide Groupon for a socially responsible product that was made 100% (or close) in the US. Preferably this product would be one that was not only created in an environmentally friendly way but that is also just a socially responsible product in itself. One idea that comes to mind is a company out of the north west that makes aluminum water bottles which promote better health and less waste than plastic bottles. They're made from recycled materials, the emply local artists, the give part of their proceeds to charities, and they've gone to great lengths to ensure their factory is as green as it can be while also ensuring the quality of their product is second to none. (if you're wondering the company is called Liberty Bottleworks and I have no affiliation with them)

Now that you know the idea, let me explain the experiment. Groupon is a very fast growing new company. They are changing the way business is done and they are growing at a very intoxicating rate. Their influence grows daily and even more than that, they seem to get a new copycat each day as well. The old dinosaur elite companies of the past are taking notice of the new crop of companies like Groupon and they are either changing with the times or losing ground quickly. The new crop is the new guard and they move quickly. They are fresh and new and most importantly, they are social and still finding their identities.

This at a time when the world needs major change, and while everyone has the ability to have a voice, most important messages are being drowned out by all the voices that are saying nothing. Just as Groupon works though, we can use the collective voices of just a few thousand to turn the tides. The thing about the new guard is that they can be utilized in ways that allow the little guy to use them as our platform. It takes an acto of congress to change McDonlad's and getting them to speak for you is a lost cause. McDonald's is a dinosaur. Groupon though can be moved. Not only can they be swayed into doing things, they can be utilized as a megaphone that trumpets the message to the rest of the world.

In my idea, I have Groupon making a few extra dollars and getting a ton of free publicity from a move that is both socially responsible and bold. The magic part for them is that it costs them almost nothing to do and it follows along with their business model now so they aren't selling themselves out. When Groupon does this, they trumpet to all of their customers an underlying message which is to buy American. They display companies that care about their employees and practices. They get the media to jump on top of the buy American story. They inspire copycats in their field and others and finally they get the dinosaurs of old to take notice and maybe bring a few of those manufacturing jobs back home.

I couldn't do any of that stuff on my own. I also couldn't do any of that stuff with a Facebook page about buying American. I don't own or control Groupon in any official capacity. Yet I know that if I can drum up even a small amount of support, I can use Groupon to spread the message far and wide.

The new guards are the platform and Facebook pages are the 2 ounce keys that start the 3000lb automobile. Now lets just see how it works.